Outlaw Triathlon - Part 1: The Training

This is one of a three part set of posts about my first iron distance triathlon: Outlaw Triathlon 2017. This post covers my pre-race training. You can also read my review of the event and the analysis of my race performance.

It had always been on my long-term goal list to complete an iron distance triathlon (2.4 mile swim, 112 mile bike and 26.2 mile run). So, when some members of my club (Team Kennet) suggested taking on the Outlaw Triathlon I had a good think and decided to give it a go.

My main worry was the volume of training required to be competitive at an event of this duration. However, over previous years, my typical training load has been somewhere between eight and twelve hours a week, which seemed fairly compatible with many ironman training plans. The big difference was just the addition of the weekly long ride, which I was successfully able to negotiate with my family.

I started training in October 2016 for the race at the end of July 2017. Initial training was just base fitness work, strength and conditioning, yoga and general preparation for the winter's cross-country running season.

For the main training block I selected the Don Fink 30-Week Competitive Training Plan. I liked the fact that this plan is fairly run heavy, which fits in well with my season's other running events such as half marathons and athletics track season. Also, three other members of my club, who were also doing the Outlaw, decided to follow the same plan as well so this synchronised well in terms of being able to do some of our long rides together.

Swim

The training plan called for three swim sessions per week. I was already doing two sessions most weeks: one club session and one on my own. I was therefore able to add an extra session, usually in a lunch break, with more open water focus closer to the event.

Working with my club coach I was able to make some big strides in my swimming, going from pacing around 2:10/100 over 1,500 meters down to being able to sustain 1:58/100 over the 3.8k swim distance. Lots of changes working first on getting my legs higher in the water; then on building a better supporting platform with my arms while breathing; finally working on a stronger catch and pull-through with a lower but more effective stroke rate.

A couple of 4k+ open water lake swims in the month before the race gave me the confidence that I could comfortably achieve the race distance.

I broadly followed the swim sessions from the training plan, except on club nights when I did my coach's planned session. The main adaptation was that I had to cut a fair few of the Don Fink sessions to make them shorter as my swim speed wasn't sufficient to fit in the entire set within the allotted swimming time.

Bike

I've been gradually improving my bike over the last couple of years, but mainly focussed on olympic triathlon distance. Prior to starting the training plan I'd only ever done one ride over 100 miles in length!

Lots of turbo trainer sessions on Zwift took place over the winter to get the base bike fitness locked in. Then starting in March I started moving outside. A very warm May and June made some of the rides quite tough, but I could feel my cycling improving each week and my average speed getting better on each ride.

The Don Fink plan typically has 4 rides each week: a session with some speed/intervals work, a shorter brick ride, a long ride (starting at 2 hours and building up to 6) followed by a run, and an easy spin at high cadence. I typically did the easy spin on the turbo and the others all outside.

For my longer rides, most were undertaken along the A4 between Thatcham (where I live) and Bath. This is a relatively flat route with similar (but fractionally hillier) terrain to the Outlaw bike course, so most of my long training was very race specific.

About half the long rides were done with my club mates (with plenty of drafting going on), great for building up the distance without maxing out the effort. I also took care to make sure that I did three of the very long rides solo: firstly to make sure I could sustain the required effort on my own; and secondly, to do the mental preparation of six hours of focused riding with no banter!

Over time my bike speed gradually improved, starting out about 27kph average on the first long ride and settling at just over 29kph by the later rides. I was therefore hopeful that on slightly flatter Outlaw route that I might be able to maintain an average speed above 30kph.

Run

Running has always been my primary (and strongest) event. Having completed a sub-3-hour marathon in 2016 I was very confident for a good run time. The Don Fink plan has quite a good run focus, but I did do a few variations to ensure that my running was compatible with racing a half marathon, a 10k and athletics track season during the training period.

Typically my run training consisted of two track sessions per week: one very hard intervals with longer rest periods and the other slightly less hard but with shorter recovery. Also included was a long run, starting at about 18km and building to 32km in the peak phase. Other runs were just brick sessions, mostly done easy and Parkrun with the kids as a recovery run. Typically doing five runs per week.

One specific thing that I did was to make sure that the brick run after my long rides was always done at target marathon race pace to that I got used to running at that speed straight off the bike.

Conclusion

Overall, the training was just about spot on. The Don Fink plan worked great and I found myself in peak condition at race time. The big four peak weeks in the plan were super tiring, but that was always to be expected. I think the plan had the perfect mix of swim, bike and run balance for my needs. I also managed to fit in a one-hour yoga session each week, which really helped with maintaining flexibility.

During the training period I was also able to complete a 1:23:11 half marathon and a sub-40 10k plus also my first middle distance triathlon as well.

Probably the only change I would make would be to try to be much more focused on getting a strength and conditioning session in each week. I started out well, but during the second half of the plan this was always the session that got dropped each week due to time constraints or tiredness.

The other thing that I would strongly recommend is undertaking training for an event such as this with friends and club mates. Going out for a group long ride made them so much more bearable. Having a social media message group also allowed us to provide support to each other and keep a bit of banter going when the going got tough. I think the whole process would have been far tougher mentally if I'd tried to do it solo. Thanks Sean, Chris, Bart, Dean and Cameron!

Immortal Half 2017

Yesterday I took part in the Immortal Half (middle distance) Triathlon at the Stourhead National Trust site in Wiltshire. Managed 67th place (out of 221 finishers) in 5:42:27, 25th (out of 69) in my age group. Here's a quick write up for any triathletes considering this event in the future...

Event was very well organised. Just big enough to have a proper race atmosphere but still small enough to have a personal feel to it. The location at Stourhead is stunning, with the finish line outside of the historic house. It's a hilly place, especially on the run, so not one to do if you don't like hills!

The Swim

Swim was 1,900m in the Stourhead lake. The water temperature was surprisingly warm for the time of year. Only downside is that the lake is very shallow in places so a lot of silt got stirred up and in places you were swimming through dark brown water full of mud – yuk! Still, my swim was good and finished in 36:50, which was okay for me. After the swim it's a 600m uphill run to transition, so a tough way to end the swim section.

The Bike

Bike course was slightly short for a middle distance event at 52 miles, but quite scenic taking in both Wiltshire and Somerset. A two lap course, best described as 'rolling': there were a good few ascents and descents along the route. Also quite exposed in places so the wind was a bit tough at times. Completed in 3:06:08 – not super fast but wanted to make sure I saved plenty for the run.

The Run

Run course is a killer - it's not an event you should do if you hate running hills! Three laps of 4.5 miles. Each lap starts with 2 miles of continuous climbing (albeit quite shallow gradient) on road. Then you turn back into the Stourhead grounds for a steep (leg killing) 500m trail descent followed by about 1.7 miles of further gentle downhill trail. Finally at the bottom by the lake it's half a mile of constant fairly steep uphill back to the main house for the next lap / finish line. Took me 1:51:06 for the (just over) half marathon distance, overtaking so many other competitors and making up over 50 places on the run!

Conclusion

Overall, very happy with my first middle distance triathlon. Great location and an enjoyable event. Definitely recommended – if you like running hills and trail!

Stryd Running Power Meter – Initial Thoughts

I backed the Stryd Running Power Meter in Kickstarter earlier this year as I thought that it looked like an interesting innovation. After a few months of waiting and some radical changes to the design, my Stryd device finally arrived yesterday. I've only taken it out on two runs so far, so this is very much an initial thoughts review. I'll follow up with more details as I get to grips with the device over the next few weeks.

The Hardware

The initial Kickstarter project was for a small clip-on device, but over the length of the project this evolved into a chest strap with built-in heart rate monitor (HRM) in addition to the power meter. Some people were a bit unhappy with this, but as I pretty much live in an HRM chest strap it doesn't really bother me that they decided on this form factor.

The actual device is somewhat larger than my current Suunto HRM, but it's very thin and light so I haven't really noticed any difference when wearing it. It looks to be a well engineered piece of kit and has the added bonus of a small flashing orange LED so that you can see that it is active, something I have struggled with on previous HRM devices.

Setup

The setup process is pretty easy. There's an iOS app that pairs the device and allows you to enter your weight (as this is essential for the power calculation). Then it's just a matter of pairing the Stryd with your GPS watch as a Power POD, and configuring an exercise mode to support power. Then it's time to go running...

Future versions of the App will apparently allow firmware upgrades and tracking of power data, but at the moment all it does is set your weight onto the Stryd. You have to have a GPS watch or use a third party phone App to track your runs and collect power data.

Data Collection and Usefulness

I've only done two runs with the Stryd so far but my initial findings are that it's power reading is a pretty good metric of what's going on with my run. There certainly seems to be a very close correlation between effort and power and their relationship to pace. Heart rate also appears to have the correct relationship to power and effort with all the usual lag in change of heart rate following change in effort.

The first thing that you notice is that when maintaining a consistent pace that power goes up when running uphill, goes down when running downhill and stabilises somewhere in middle when running on the flat. All as you would expect. I also found that I could maintain a fairly consistent power by slowing my pace on the uphill and running harder on the down.

For a fairly steady run at about 5:23/km (a pace I can sustain at aerobic effort for a long duration run) power was a fairly steady 252 watts. This seems about right and corresponds reasonably well to the same normalised power output of similar effort on the bike.

I also did a short test to see how power relates to running form. Over a six minute period on a flat gravel path I did three minutes trying to hold my best running form (high cadence, mid-foot strike, short stride length, pelvis up and forward, head high) and then three minutes trying to do the opposite (over-striding, heel strike, bum sticking out, slouched shoulders). The graphs covering this period are shown below:

You can clearly see for the first part that the power is fairly consistent in a band of about 252-270 watts, averaging out at 262 watts on a pace of 4:38/km. Heart rate gradually climbs as I'm going faster than I was previously and then levels out.

The second part shows a very different picture. Power is jumping around all over the place in a band ranging from 237-318 watts, with an average of 269 watts. Average pace is a bit slower at 4:46/km (couldn't run any quicker with such a broken running style!). Heart rate continues to climb above it's previous level.

So, evidence is that power looks to be a good measure of running form and efficiency. For a given pace on a consistent terrain it looks as if a drop in running form is directly related to an increase in power and visa-versa. This is definitely something I will be experimenting with further to determine if, for a given target pace, I can achieve it with a lower power value.

Also it's probably a good way to measure the rate at which running form decays over a long run by maintaining a consistent pace and seeing how power required to hold this pace goes up over time. Another option would be to pick a consistent power and see how pace required to hold that power slows over time.

The other thing I really want to play around with is whether the running surface has a significant impact on power and whether different technique adaptations for the surface can impact that power. The only firm conclusion I have from my runs so far are that grass requires about 10-15 watts more power to run at the same pace compared to road or gravel path. Any other comparison from my runs don't have value as the only time I spent on road was at the end of the long run when fatigue had already started to kick in.

Device Weaknesses

While I'm pretty pleased with the Stryd, it is pretty much a running only device. This makes is less useful during the triathlon season as far as I can see.

First off, it's not really waterproof enough to wear while swimming (the instructions say that you can rinse it under a tap to clean, but that's about it). Also, my Suunto HRM has on-board memory to capture heart rate while swimming that it then syncs to my Ambit3 when out of the water and a connection is re-established. The Stryd doesn't have this feature.

Secondly, the Stryd pairs to the Ambit3 as a 'Power POD', which means that wearing it on the bike could give some strange results (not actually tested this yet). For example, riding a bike without a power meter but with Power POD support enabled would likely cause the Ambit3 to think the Stryd was actually a bike power meter and record some very low power values. Not sure what would happen if I had both a bike power meter and the Stryd available at the same time - which one would be selected?

So, in a triathlon scenario I'd probably be left with two options:

• swap straps in T2 from my Suunto HRM to the Stryd ready for the run – doesn't make for an efficient T2 and probably not practical for anything but long course events
• wear both my Suunto HRM and the Stryd strap for the swim and bike and then just clip the Stryd to the strap in T2 – slightly faster, but means wearing 2 straps for the whole event, which isn't very comfortable

I personally can't see the current Stryd iteration getting much use during triathlon except on pure run workouts.

Ecosystem Issues

While the Stryd is a pretty neat, clever and polished device, it's something very new to have power data in running mode and to have a single device that captures both power and heart rate data. At the moment this seems to have broken quite a lot of the ecosystem that I use. Hopefully this will gradually resolve itself over the next few months as everyone catches up with Stryd's innovation.

As of today, here's some of the ecosystem issues I've discovered:

Suunto Abmit3

The Ambit3 probably has the best support for the Stryd as it already allows capturing power data in running modes (on Garmin devices you have to currently run using a cycling mode to support the Stryd!).

That said, there are a couple of issues that the Ambit3 still has:

• It currently can't stream both power and heart rate data from the Stryd at the same time. If you pair the Stryd as a Power POD then it's useless as an HRM. Suunto are apparently working on new watch firmware to overcome this problem. In the meantime I'm running with two chest straps so that I can get power and heart rate data - and it's a bit uncomfortable!
• For some reason I'm not getting any cadence data when using the Stryd. It looks like pairing it as a Power POD disables the cadence sensor built in to the Ambit3 and assumes cadence will come from the Stryd, but this data doesn't seem to be available. Hopefully this is just a bug that will be resolved by the next firmware updates as I tend to do quite a lot of work on maintaining a high cadence.

Suunto Movescount

Movescount seems to handle runs with power quite happily. The data is captured nicely and you can graph and explore the power values.

I have however found an error in Movescount where the FIT file format export seems to be missing occasional data points. When you drop this into Stryd Power Centre it results in a very jagged graph. Training Peaks uses the same FIT files and it also has the same missing data points problem. The data points aren't missing in GPX and TCX files so I've raised this as a bug with Suunto.

Stryd Power Centre

The Stryd Power Centre site seems to work pretty well and draws some nice graphs. Will be interesting to see how this develops over time. It should grow to be fully featured as it's an integral part of the Stryd offering.

Unfortunately it deals with the error in the Suunto FIT files by rendering zero values for power and heart rate if a data point is missing, which results in a very difficult to analyse, jagged graph. Training Peaks takes a better approach by just not rendering a data point in the graph for any data points that are missing.

Strava

Strava seems to quite happily receive runs from Movescount that contain power and hold on to that data. However it currently doesn't provide any way to view the power information for a run. It does export the power data to sites that pull data from Strava (e.g. VeloVeiwer) which is good.

Training Peaks

Training Peaks takes its data from Movescount in FIT file format so exhibits the missing data points problem. It currently doesn't display any power summary information for run activities, but if you expand the activity view you can see power on the graph and get lots of other interesting power metrics.

VeloViewer

VeloViewer pulls activity data from Strava and allows you to do lots of extra analysis on your performance. It successfully retrieves all of the power data for a run and graphs it properly. Also, because it's GPX based it doesn't suffer from the missing data point problem. This will probably become my default site for analysing my Stryd recorded runs until the other sites resolve their various bugs and lack of features.

Summary

From my initial runs, the Stryd looks very promising. Running power certainly appears to be a useful metric for evaluating form and efficiency. For any given pace and terrain it looks to be a much more stable metric than heart rate and a good measure of effort expended. Still lots of experiments to do though before I consider switching power to be my primary run training metric. I will be very interested to see the output from my next track intervals session on Monday.

At the moment, I'd say that the ecosystem is the main thing that is letting the Stryd down. If you are happy to be an early adopter and work round things that don't quite function as you would want then Stryd is certainly worth some experimentation. If you are after something that is polished and just works with all your devices and running data sites then I'd suggest waiting a few more months until the ecosystem catches up with this new and innovative approach to running metrics.

Newbury Triathlon 2015

This weekend saw me compete in my third ever triathlon - the Team Kennet Newbury Triathlon 2015. This was the same event that I did last year for my first triathlon. It's nice and local to me and has lots of people that I know competing.

This year as well as the event itself I had a little smack-down going with some local friends (Nick and Andy) as we are all at roughly the same performance level but have never raced against each other before. An added motivation to do well!

The race is a sprint triathlon format, based at Newbury's Northcroft Leisure Centre. It consists of a 300-yard pool swim, 22km bike ride and a 5km run. Last year I finished in 40th place (out of about 400 starters) in a time of 1:09:48. This year I'd trained harder and had more race experience, so I was hoping for a much better performance.

Preparation

When I did Newbury Tri last year I'd only been swimming for about eight months and cycling for about five. Since then I've been swimming every week and two or three times a week for the last 4 months. I've also put in a lot more cycling mileage, including a lot of triathlon specific bike training. I've also upgraded my bike, adding aero bars and adopting a much more aggressive riding position. I was therefore much more prepared both physically and technique wise to tackle this event.

In addition, I've also completed in another big triathlon event (Blenheim Palace Tri) and done a lot more transition practice, so I was a lot more confident mentally as well as physically. This was also a close friend's first triathlon event so I'd spent a fair bit of time helping him to prepare, practice transitions and so on. It's amazing how much extra clarity and confidence you get after having taken someone else through the whole event and procedures!

Pre-Race

The morning dawned clear and sunny with almost no wind, but pretty cold. Once the sun got going it started to warm up nicely. Perfect racing conditions. Met up with my friend and we took a nice leisurely cycle for the four miles from our homes to Northcroft Leisure Centre. This made a nice little leg spin to get the muscles moving.

Arriving at the venue we headed into registration. Numbers collected; race timing chip round the ankle; hands graffiti'ed with maker-pen numbers; technical t-shirt grabbed. As with last year the registration process was well organised and effortless. We took our bikes into transition and I helped my friend set up as his start time was 90 minutes before mine. Also met up with Nick and Andy to discuss the prospects for the day and drool over Nick's slippery bike!

Next it was off to pool-side to meet up with both mine and my friend's families and cheer him on through the first stage of the race. Interestingly, I was far more nervous for him that I was about my own looming race. He had a great swim and was soon on his way on the bike.

Now it was time to focus on my race. I returned to transition and set up all my kit. Bike shoes attached to cleats and held level with elastic bands. Running shoes with a bit of talc and some vaseline, so that I could bike and run without needing socks – something I've been practising over the summer and a great speed up in T1. Number belt, bike helmet and sunglasses. Nice and simple.

The Swim

Newbury Triathlon takes place in Newbury's amazing 75 yard (72m) long outdoor heated Lido pool. The original Lido dates back to 1870 with its current form being from the 1930s. It's a lovely place to swim and I've been using it each week for training since it opened at the beginning of summer. Sadly the poor August weather this year meant it didn't get used as much as it should have. Hopefully this won't effect any decisions about opening it next year!

The swim is four lengths of the pool, for a total distance of 300 yards. Competitors are set off in pairs at 30 second intervals. You swim up one lane, move across a bit swim down the next, under the centre rope and up the third lane, and finally across a bit more to the final lane for the last length. Up the steps in the corner and out through a little gate into the car park transition area.

Swimming is by far my weakest discipline, despite all the effort I've put in to improving it. However, the first two lengths I started strong, maintaining a good bilateral breathing pattern. By the end of the second length I was overtaking one of the swimmers who started 30 seconds before me. Lengths three and four I had to switch to breathing every two strokes in order to keep my pace high. Overtook the other person from the pair ahead of me. Out of the water and through the gate in 5:47 – 30 seconds quicker than last year.

Excluding the pool exit part, pace for the swim was about 1:44/100m, which is well above the pace I usually sustain, so very pleased even if there is still a long way to go in my swimming journey.

T1

The first transition from swim to bike is usually the most tricky. Balance is effected from just having moved from a horizontal to vertical position. There's also a few bits to do: sunglasses, helmet and number belt. This year I opted to cycle and run without socks, so that was a lot less faffing than my previous triathlons. My official T1 time was 35 seconds, which was the second fastest of the day and 9 seconds faster than last year. Except...

After crossing the mount line it all went a bit pear shaped: I crossed the line and climbed on the bike and as I did this I managed to steer the bike off the path onto the grass. Failed to slip my right foot into the shoe and while sorting this out my left foot fell off the pedal. The left shoe then dragged the floor and separated from the cleat. Got the right foot in and the bike back on the path but left my other shoe behind on the floor! Had to stop the bike, get off and go retrieve the shoe before finally sorting everything out and getting going again.

Amazingly, the GPS trace shows this only costing me 20 seconds, but that was still two places lost in the final standings. I really need to spend a lot more time practising the bike mount before my next event in October!

The Bike

After a disastrous start, I was determined to push hard on the bike. I knew Andy was starting only a minute and a half behind me, was a similar speed swimmer and a much faster rider so I wanted to stay ahead of him for as long as possible.

Got down on to my aero bars as quickly as possible and was soon overtaking other riders. Powered through the course as hard as possible, overtaking all the way. Heart-rate averaging about 170bpm all the way, which for me is pretty much on my lactate threshold effort. Looking as some estimated power readings (I don't have a power meter), they show a mean estimated power of 199w, normalised at 248w. This is the highest estimated power I've achieved over a sustained effort, so very pleased with this.

The first part of the course is a gently undulating country road. Nice and easy to ride, but requiring care when overtaking other riders as oncoming cars are often not quite as far over their side of the road as they should be. Next comes the gentle climb from Welford to Wickham. It's not very steep, but goes on for quite a long time, with the route's steepest hill at the end. I was buoyed going up this hill as the rider I was overtaking shouted out “you're going pretty fast!”. Thanks, it gave me a boost. The final section back to Newbury is a busier road, but it's pretty much flat or slightly downhill the whole way. Perfect for getting really aero, selecting a big gear and laying down some speed!

Unfortunately there was a bit of bad luck involved and I got slowed significantly by cars at three roundabouts and at a set of temporary traffic lights that had appeared two days before the event. Looking at GPS data, I estimate that these probably cost me another 20-30 seconds over having a clear run through. This equates to another one or two places in the final results.

Overall I've got to be very pleased with my bike leg time of 39:53, which is 2:31 faster than last year even with all the slowness. Nick thrashed me on the bike by just over two minutes (more about this in the summary) and unfortunately Andy had a puncture and had to retire.

T2

My dismount into T2 was pretty much perfect: feet out of the shoes nice and early on the straight before, off the bike with a running dismount and into transition. A quick 26 seconds to rack the bike, slip on the running shoes, remove the helmet and off again. Fifth fastest T2 of the day, 15 seconds quicker than last year.

The Run

The run didn't go as well as I had hoped. Having given it my all on the bike I was unable to sustain the running pace that I am capable of over a 5k distance. Started well with the first half a km at 4:10/km pace while I got into my running. Then got a massive stitch and rather than speeding up to my usual 5k pace, had to drop down to 4:30/km for the next 3.5k while it went away. Finally it cleared and I was able to complete the remainder of the run at 3:47/km pace.

The run course is a mix of footpath, narrow trail and canal tow-path. It's a nice route to run although the trail bit makes it pretty hard to overtake slower runners. I caught a couple up during this section of the run, which I think didn't help my pace particularly either.

Finished the run in 20:21, which was 36 seconds slower than last year and well off the 18 minutes I should have been capable of at my normal 5k pace (the run is slightly short at 4.6k). A solid reminder that triathlon is all about balancing the three disciplines.

Results

My overall time for the event was 1:07:03, which was 2 minutes and 45 seconds quicker than last year. A great result, but a long way from the 1:05:00 I was targeting. Finished in 24th place overall from 343 starters, and 12th in my age group.
My swim was 55th fastest, bike 32nd and run 36th. It's easy to see how bad a run I had as that's by far my best discipline and I'd normally be looking for a top-10 run in an event like this.

Full results available here.

Summary

Overall I'm pleased with my improvement, especially the big strides I've made in the swim and bike sections of the race. Removing a stupid bike mount mistake and some bad luck with the traffic I would have been a few places higher and significantly closer to my target time. I've also got a very clear focus on what to practice for my next event: bike mount, bike mount, bike mount!

I also had a good reminder that triathlon is about three events, not just one. No point pushing hard on the bike to gain a couple of minutes then loosing more that that on my strongest discipline! I think the prospect of our little smack-down and wanting to keep ahead of Andy for as long as possible on the bike may have forced some bad pacing choices. Lesson learnt for the future.

As to the smack-down, Nick comprehensively smashed me with a finish time of 1:03:05 for 7th place. I pipped him slightly on the swim and transitions, but he took over two minutes out of me on both the bike and run legs. Given our similar fitness and running performance levels I can draw a few interesting conclusions:

• Having a really good aero TT bike is definitely worth a couple of kph average speed (mine was 33.5kph, Nick's was 35.9kph over the main Strava segment covering most of the of the course).
• It also looks highly likely that a good TT bike means that this extra speed can be gained from a fractionally lower level of exertion. This result being that you can come off the bike with more energy to invest in the run.
• Nick has also had a professional bike fit on his bike which also looks to have contributed not only to his bike performance but also left him in a much better physical shape to nail the run leg.

Investing in a good TT specific bike looks like a really good option for my future triathlon ambitions. Better get saving!

I thoroughly enjoyed the event. Team Kennet did a fantastic job of organising it and the marshals were excellent. Hope to be back next year, although I may be helping to organise given that I've recently joined up with Team Kennet.

Blenheim Palace Triathlon – 14th June 2015

This part weekend I competed in the Blenheim Palace Triathlon, a sprint distance event set in the grounds of the beautiful Blenheim Palace on Oxfordshire. The event was great and incredibly well organised and I thoroughly enjoyed my first open water swim triathlon.

The Event

This was a sprint distance triathlon, consisting of 750m lake swim, 19.8km bike ride and a 5.4km run. The even took place over both days of the weekend, with me competing on the Sunday. It was primarily a sprint distance event, although there were a few super-sprint waves plus a couple of corporate relay waves as well. Got lucky with the weather, as by the time I started on the Sunday lunchtime the drizzle had disappeared and the bike course had mostly dried out.

My Performance

I was very happy with my performance, finishing the event in 1:23:36, which was just a fraction quicker than my target time of 1:25:00. Finished in 192nd position out of just over 4200 starters, and 36th place in the M40-44 age group. There were 78 competitors in my wave, from which I finished in 3rd place. Breakdown of the time was:

Event	Time	Position Overall	Position in Wave
Swim	15:48	770th	15th
T1	04:06	205th	1st
Bike	39:07	457th	9th
T2	01:21	53rd	2nd
Run	23:17	118th	1st

My full results can be seen here.

The Swim

This was my first ever open water swimming event. Prior to the race I'd done four other open water swims in the local training lake, but if was safe to say this was the part of the day that I was looking forward to the least.

The lake start is a 5-10 minute walk downhill from transition, so make sure you leave in plenty of time. It's also a path with a few stones, so if you have supporters it's worth walking down in flip-flops and getting them to bring them back up. The assembly point was pretty friendly and we collected our wave coloured swim caps . The safety briefing was excellent and ended with a hug with the person next to us. Then it was in to the water and a short swim out to the deep water start.

The lake at Blenheim is fairly deep and you can't see the bottom, so not one for very nervous swimmers. I'd reached a point in training where I knew I was comfortable with the distance, so it was just a case of dealing with the mass start and keeping my breathing under control. The horn sounded and we were off.

The first 300m was horrible! Even though I'd tried to position myself to keep out of the melee, I found myself surrounded by jostling people. People bashing in to me, hitting my legs, cutting across in front so that I hit them. It was almost impossible to get into a good swimming rhythm, my breathing was all over the place and a building sense of panic started to come over me.

I focused hard on keeping my breathing smooth and trying to relax. Then, the field started to spread out a bit and I found some smoother water and clear space. I was then able to get into a good stroke and breathing rhythm and everything settled down nicely. Managed to turn nice and tight to the buoy and even started overtaking some other swimmers during the closing stages.

Then I was at the slip ramp, out of the water, through the shower and heading up the hill towards transition. I didn't think of looking back to see how many people were still in the water, but I imagined that I was a good way down the field at this point (when actually I was 15th out of the water).

The swim part of the event can be seen below. My watch measured it at 870m, but that includes a bit of the run at the end and the fact that my line wasn't perfectly straight due to dealing with other swimmers and my inability to swim straight!

T1

The run from the lake back to transition is 400m, all uphill on a coarse carpet. I was out of the top part of my wetsuit by half way and taking care to try and stop my heart rate spiking too high. Looking at the stats I was fairly successful as it reached 179 just after exiting the water and I had it back to below 170 by the time I reached my bike.

It was at this point I realised I'd actually had quite a good swim as there were very few people in our rack lane of transition.

I'd laid out my kit carefully and it paid off. Wetsuit slid off easily (glad I'd practiced that in the back garden the day before!). Number belt and socks went on quickly as did bike hat and sun glasses. Pushed the bike out and did a smooth mount, including getting into my pre-clipped shoes with no drama.

I was the 205th fastest of the whole event through T1 and the fastest in my wave. Probably the only way I can significantly improve on this stage is to drop the socks and bike and run in just shoes. I'll definitely be testing this out before my next event in September.

One other word of note is that transition is carpeted, but the carpet appears to have been laid over a stone/gravel courtyard. You can feel the stones right through the carpet! I have bruises on the bottom of my feet from standing on these stones during transition. No way to avoid it, but something to be prepared for.

The Bike

I've been working hard on my bike and I think this had a real impact on my bike leg performance. I felt strong throughout the bike leg and the three laps seemed to pass by in a flash. The bike course at Blenheim is pretty undulating, with one longish (1km) steep up-hill (5-11%) and a couple of nice down-hills, including 2km at about 2-3% gradient. Felt strong on the up-hills and took the down-hills pretty fast. Perhaps slightly too tentative on the first lap, but attacked the hills more on laps 2 and 3. Strava estimates my average power at 211w, which is significantly higher than I usually achieve on training rides.

The only complaint I have over the bike course is other riders. Unfortunately the two waves prior to ours were corporate relay waves and thus, by the time I reached the bike, the course was still full of riders travelling significantly slower than I was. On the up hills there were lots of people wobbling all over the place at walking pace, which made overtaking on the fairly narrow paths a somewhat risky endeavour. Then on the down-hills there were lots of people travelling a bit slower than me but still making various overtaking manoeuvres on a number of very tentative riders. I therefore had to hold back slightly in a few places more out of safety concerns for myself and other riders.

I think the marshals could have done a better job of ensuring that slower riders kept well to the left to leave enough space for overtaking. There were some places where I had to brake on a downhill in order to avoid the drafting zone of the bike in front as there was just no space to overtake safely with riders already 2 or 3 abreast. The top bike times from our wave were all slower than most other waves and I think this was largely down to the volume of other riders littering the course.

I also found it quite disconcerting that in a few places there were marshals positioned with white flags yelling at everyone to slow down. I understand this is for safety, due to tight bends or bumpy roads, but after the first lap I felt my awareness of the course was good enough to be able to take these at speed and in full control. However I still felt obliged to back off slightly with the marshals shouting 'Slow Down' at you repeatedly!

Given a clearer course and the fact that I now know all the bumps, turns and hills, I think I could probably shave another minute or so off the bike leg if I attempted it again.

T2

I managed a smooth dismount from the bike, including taking my feet out of my shoes on the final straight with no incident. Quickly back to the bike stand, although I did loose a couple of seconds trying to spot my kit position on the rack, even though I'd mentally marked it's location in line with the advertising hoarding logos. Hat off and into running shoes. Then off again. I was 53rd fastest in the whole event in T2 and second fastest in my wave.

Took the gel that I'd attached to my bike but didn't need so I could fuel up early in the run. A great transition and probably still have a few seconds I could shave off as well in the future.

The Run

The run was always likely to be my strongest discipline and it turned out to be true. I felt really strong through the run and managed to complete this part in the 118th fastest time of the day, and 1st in my wave: more than twenty seconds faster than the next best.

I probably could have pushed a fraction harder in the first lap of the run, but a cracking second lap averaging 4:00/km on a very undulating course made for a strong finish. Lots of overtaking runners from the earlier corporate waves also gave the feeling of moving very fast!

One thing I did find very different was the fact that by this stage in the event everyone is very spaced out, including runners from multiple waves on the same 2-lap course. I was therefore running largely alone without knowing where I was relative to other racers in my wave. This is a very different sensation to a mass start run where you are constantly striving to catch the runner just ahead of you, knowing that each person you overtake is an improved place in the final results.

Crossed the line with a big smile and picked up my medal, bottle of water and a glass of Erdinger Alkoholfrei isotonic beer (I'm a non-drinker and don't really like beer, but this tasted okay – however that might just be because I was really thirsty at this point!).

Atmosphere and Organisation

For such a large event, I'd have to say that the organisation was immaculate. Everything ran pretty much like clockwork. Pre-race packs arrived early and the race guide had everything you needed to know clearly spelled out. Parking was well organised and timing chip collection very smooth

Racking bikes in transition was very well managed. All the instructions were really well presented and the announcements in transition and the swim start were clear and precise. The pre-race briefing was superb. All the marshals did a great job and offered clear instructions and direction, although those on the bike course could have done a slightly better job keeping slow riders to the left of the paths.

With such a big event you always get a great atmosphere and there was plenty of cheering on the way up from the swim and around the main straight in front of the palace building. Race village was good and there were plenty of toilets and lots of good food options.

Conclusions

I had a really enjoyable day, got a great time, conquered the mass-start open water swim that I was really nervous about and put in a very strong bike leg. The event was really well organised, if a bit expensive to enter. I'd certainly recommend it as a great location for a first sprint triathlon.

I'd certainly consider going back again next year, but I'm also keen to step up to standard (olympic) distance events and Blenheim Palace doesn't offer this distance as an option. I'd therefore be doing it as more of a training race, and it's probably a bit too expensive to enter on this basis.

Now going to take it easy for a few weeks, keep up the open water swimming and start thinking about training for my local pool based sprint triathlon at the start of September.